Disintegration: Dynamics and Polemics of Umayyad and Abbasid Leadership
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background. The Umayyad dynasty was the beginning of absolute monarchy in the Islamic concept of government. Muawiyah as the founder of the dynasty actually adopted from the two previous great empires of Byzatium and Persia. Purpose. The aim of the Umayyad rule was to develop science. At the end of the Umayyad rule, around the seventh century, there were a number of revolts throughout the country. Method. The writing of this article uses the manuscript review method, in this writing is the Disintegration of the Umayyad Dynasty and the Abbasid Dynasty in the Years 1000 - 1250 AD. the source used is secondary data where the author uses literature obtained from literature studies to several journals, books, and trusted articles. Writing with a study of several sources of books or journals is intended to get more complex data to make one complete writing. Results. In the first period, the Abbasid dynasty faced many challenges and disturbances. Several political movements that undermined the government and destabilized it appeared everywhere, both internal movements of the Abbas family itself and from outside. Conclusion. The situation of the Abbasid dynasty before the disintegration was relatively stable, the situation was seen that all the problems faced in the early period could be resolved properly. It is even famous in history that the first period of the Abbasid dynasty was a period of progress, where all lines of life experienced rapid progress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it