Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents Access to, and Success in, Higher Education in Post-apartheid South Africa: Social Justice Analysis Chika Sehoole and Kolawole Samuel Adeyemo ....................1 Revisiting the Postmodern Condition of a Higher Education Landscape: South Africa’s Higher Education Epochal Archive, 1999–2002 Chaka Chaka & Mashudu Churchill Mashige .......................19 A Decade of Biomedical Research in West Africa (2005–14): A Bibliometric Analysis of the Ten Most Productive Countries in MEDLINE Williams Ezinwa Nwagwu ......................43 A Review of Academic Freedom in Africa through the Prism of the UNESCO 1997 Recommendation Kwadwo Appiagyei-Atua, Klaus Beiter & Terence Karran..................85 Reconnecting the University to Society: The Role of Knowledge as Public Good in South African Higher Education Michael Cross and Amasa Ndofirepi .............................119 Availability of Study Time for Undergraduate Finance Students at an Open and Distance Learning Institution in South Africa C.F. Erasmus and G.P.M. Grebe .........................141 Towards the Institutionalization of Research Uptake Management in Sub-Saharan African Universities Sara S. Grobbelaar and Tomas Harber ............................155
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.491 | 0.233 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".