THE CONTRALATERAL LIMB IS NOT AN ADEQUATE REHABILITATION GOAL FOR ASSESSING MUSCLE FUNCTION IN AN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT-INJURED PAEDIATRIC POPULATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate changes in quadriceps and hamstrings muscle groups during sustained isokinetic knee flexion and extension. 125 paediatric participants (45 males and 80 females, mean age 14.2 years) were divided into two groups: participants with a confirmed ACL tear (ACLi, n = 64), and puberty- and activity-level matched control participants with no prior history of knee injuries (CON, n = 61). Participants completed a series of 44 repetitions of isokinetic knee flexion and extension at 90 deg/ sec using a Biodex dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems Inc, Shirley, New York). Surface EMG sensors (Delsys Incorporated, Natick, MA) simultaneously recorded the quadriceps and hamstring activations. Muscle function was assessed as the change in quadriceps activation and extension torque were calculated using the percent difference between the mean of the first five trials, and the mean of the last five trials. ACLi participants had significantly higher percent change in quadriceps activation for both healthy and injured legs, in comparison to CON dominant leg. As such, the healthy leg of the ACLi participants is activating significantly more than their health matched controls, while also demonstrating reduced muscular endurance (less torque in later repetitions). Therefore, we conclude that the non-injured limb of the ACLi participant is not performing as a healthy limb. Since return to activity clearance following ACLi implies return to sport against age- and activity matched opponents, clearing young athletes based on the non-injured contralateral limb may put them at greater risk of reinjury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".