MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385295680 · doi:10.1080/09638288.2023.2236026

Social participation in adults with cerebral palsy: a systematic review of the evidence-base

2023· review· en· W4385295680 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Claire Cooper, Mark Linden, Claire Kerr

Bibliographic record

VenueDisability and Rehabilitation · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQueen's UniversityQueen's University BelfastDepartment for the Economy
KeywordsPsycINFOCINAHLCerebral palsyPsychological interventionAutonomyPsychologySocial engagementCritical appraisalSocial supportInclusion (mineral)Social isolationQuality of life (healthcare)GerontologyMEDLINEDevelopmental psychologyApplied psychologyMedicineSocial psychologyAlternative medicinePsychiatrySocial sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To identify and synthesise the current evidence on social participation in adults with cerebral palsy (CP).Methods: Four databases (PubMed, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were systematically searched between December 2021 and February 2022.Pre-specified eligibility criteria were applied to all identified studies resulting in the inclusion of 16 articles.Data extraction was performed using a standardised tool and quality appraisal was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.A narrative synthesis approach was taken for data analysis. Results:The 16 included studies were rated as high (n = 11) and medium quality (n = 5).Numbers of participants included in the studies ranged from 7 to 335.Definitions of social participation were discussed.Common themes were identified: the impact of home and work environments on social participation, the importance of age-appropriate support and interventions, and the impact of limited autonomy on social participation.Conclusions: Adults with CP experience limited social participation due to lack of appropriate support in childhood, issues across the lifespan including physical limitations when ageing, and factors such as societal expectations and inaccessible environments which limit opportunities for autonomy.Social participation may be improved by supporting families to provide opportunities in childhood, providing timely interventions, and by enhancing autonomy. h IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION• Considering the support needs of the wider family, in order to build a supportive family environment in childhood, could improve social participation opportunities for individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) in adulthood.• Social participation in adulthood may be improved by encouraging independence and autonomy in childhood and adolescence.• Taking a lifespan approach to services for individuals with CP could improve social participation and better prepare them for the challenges of adulthood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.005
Bibliometrics0.0120.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDisability and RehabilitationSame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207