MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385297223 · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00197-8

Global prevalence, cascade of care, and prophylaxis coverage of hepatitis B in 2022: a modelling study

2023· article· en· W4385297223 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Devin Razavi‐Shearer, Ivane Gamkrelidze, Calvin Q. Pan, Jidong Jia, Thomas Berg, Richard T. Gray, Ponsiano Ocama, Hailemichael Desalegn, Zaigham Abbas, Ayat R. Abdallah, Alessio Aghemo, Sabohat Ahmadbekova, Sang Hoon Ahn, Inka Aho, Ulus Salih Akarca, N. Masri, Abduljaleel Alalwan, Seyed Moayed Alavian, Soo Aleman, Faleh Z. Al-Faleh, Waleed K. Al‐Hamoudi, Abdulrahman Aljumah, Khalid Al‐Naamani, Ahmad Al‐Rifai, Ibrahim Altraif, Amarsanaa Jazag, Motswedi Anderson, Monique Andersson, Tarik Asselah, Kostas Athanasakis, Oidov Baatarkhuu, Ziv Ben‐Ari, Aïcha Bensalem, Abdul Rahman Bizri, Sarah Blach, Wornei Silva Miranda Braga, Carlos Eduardo Brandão‐Mello, Carol Brosgart, Peer Brehm Christensen, Nina Weis

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis B Virus Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCilagPan American Health OrganizationGenentechNational Institutes of HealthNational Science and Technology CouncilNorgineAOP OrphanIpsenEuropean Association for the Study of the LiverJanssen PharmaceuticalsAngelini PharmaShionogiState Government of VictoriaSwedish Orphan BiovitrumNovo NordiskAstellas PharmaEisaiAlexion PharmaceuticalsSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungPfizerEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and ControlBoston Scientific CorporationStiftung für LeberkrankheitenAsociación Española para el Estudio del HígadoAlnylam PharmaceuticalsNational Cancer InstituteGilead SciencesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesAustralian GovernmentIndiviorWorld Health OrganizationGlaxoSmithKlineAbbott LaboratoriesCSL BehringAllerganAstraZenecaBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyCanadian Association for the Study of the LiverAmgenIntercept PharmaceuticalsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCascadeMedicineVirologyEnvironmental healthInternal medicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations404
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venue˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatologySame topicHepatitis B Virus StudiesFrench-language works237,207