MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385307899 · doi:10.22323/1.444.1166

Pathfinders of the Pacific Ocean Neutrino Experiment

2023· article· en· W4385307899 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Christian Spannfellner, Patrick Hatch, K. Holzapfel, Li Ruohan, Braeden Veenstra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNarodowym Centrum NaukiEuropean CommissionCanada First Research Excellence FundNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPathfinderNeutrinoNeutrino detectorOceanographyDetectorRemote sensingEnvironmental sciencePhysicsGeologyNeutrino oscillationComputer scienceOpticsParticle physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pacific Ocean Neutrino Experiment (P-ONE) is a proposed neutrino telescope located off the coast of Vancouver Island, Canada. With a planned instrumented volume of over one cubic kilometer, P-ONE aims to measure high-energy neutrinos to gain further insights into astrophysical accelerators and the cosmos. However, the dynamic ocean environment presents challenges, such as changing ocean currents influencing the detector geometry and the bioluminescent light background. The P-ONE collaboration, in association with Ocean Networks Canada (ONC), is developing durable deep-sea detector systems to overcome these challenges. In 2018 and 2020, respectively, the pathfinder experiments STRAW (STRings for Absorption length in Water) and STRAW-b were deployed to characterize and monitor the optical properties and the background light caused by bioluminescence and $^{40}$K in the Cascadia Basin. These pathfinders include three strings with diverse instruments such as spectrometers, LiDARs, cameras, and early prototype optical modules. An overview of recent findings from the STRAW and STRAW-b measurements will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207