Mapping of the Cladosporium fulvum resistance gene Cf-16, a major gene involved in leaf mold disease in tomato
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) is widely cultivated and consumed worldwide. Tomato leaf mold, caused by Cladosporium fulvum , is one of the most devastating diseases in tomato production. At present, some tomato leaf mold resistance ( Cf series) genes used in production gradually lose resistance due to the continuous and rapid differentiation of C. fulvum physiological races. The Cf-16 gene derived from the “Ontario7816” tomato cultivar has shown effective resistance in field trials for many years, but few studies have reported on the mapping of the Cf-16 gene, which has not been cloned, limiting its utilization in tomato breeding. Here, we mapped Cf-16 using a novel comprehensive strategy including bulk segregation analysis (BSA), genome resequencing and SSR molecular markers. A genetic analysis revealed that Cf-16 resistance in “Ontario7816” is controlled by one major dominant locus. The Cf-16 gene was mapped in a region of 2.6 cM at chromosome 6 between two markers, namely, TGS447 and TES312, by using an F 2 population from a cross between the resistant cultivar “Ontario7816” and susceptible line “Moneymaker.” Two nucleotide-binding-site-leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) resistance genes, namely, XM_004240667.3 and XM_010323727.1, were identified in this interval. They are strong candidates for the Cf-16 gene. The mapping of Cf-16 may speed up its utilization for breeding resistant tomato varieties and represents an important step forward in our understanding of the mechanism underlying resistance to tomato leaf mold.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".