MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385330391 · doi:10.1002/ctm2.1327

Dissecting the cell of origin of aberrant SALL4 expression in myelodysplastic syndrome

2023· letter· en· W4385330391 on OpenAlexaff
Hiro Tatetsu, Miho Watanabe, Jun Liu, Kenji Tokunaga, Eisaku Iwanaga, Yoshihiro Komohara, Emily M. Thrash, Mahmoud A. Bassal, Masao Matsuoka, Daniel G. Tenen, Li Chai

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Translational Medicine · 2023
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsFluidigm (Canada)
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMyelodysplastic syndromesGATA2MedicineCancer researchTranscription factorBone marrowInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemMyeloid leukemiaMyeloidHaematopoiesisLeukemiaDysplasiaMass cytometryStem cellBioinformaticsBiologyImmunologyGenePathologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dear Editor,Despite the increased reports on oncofetal protein Spalt like transcription factor 4 (SALL4) in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), the cellular identity of its aberrant expression in MDS patients remains unknown.Uncovering the answer to this question has important implications for furthering our understanding of the pathogenesis of F I G U R E 1 SALL4 RNA and protein were expressed in MDS bone marrow cells.(A) SALL4 expression in MDS CD34 positive cells from the public database GSE19429.(B) SALL4 expression in CD34 positive cells in MDS subtype from the public database GSE19429.RA, refractory anemia; RARS, refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts; RAEB1, refractory anemia with excess blasts1; RAEB2, refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts2.(C) MMI of SALL4 in bone marrow cells on CyTOF (MDS patients, n = 10, control BM, n = 5, error bars indicate standard deviation).Data analysis used Mann-Whitney U test.*p ≤ .05;**p ≤ .01. ns, not significant; HSPC, hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell; HSC, Hematopoietic stem cell; HPC, hematopoietic progenitor cell; MPP, multipotent progenitors, CMP; common myeloid progenitor; GMP granulocyte-monocyte progenitor; MEP, megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitor; NK cell, natural killer cell; MMI, median metal intensity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Translational MedicineSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207