MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385332959 · doi:10.1130/b36999.1

The “Judith River−Belly River problem” revisited (Montana-Alberta-Saskatchewan): New perspectives on the correlation of Campanian dinosaur-bearing strata based on a revised stratigraphic model updated with CA-ID-TIMS U-Pb geochronology

2023· article· en· W4385332959 on OpenAlexaffabout
Raymond R. Rogers, David A. Eberth, Jahandar Ramezani

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsRoyal Tyrrell Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPaleontologyMarine transgressionCretaceousAlluviumFaciesArchaeologyGeographyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Terrestrial strata of the Judith River−Belly River wedge, widely exposed in the plains of north-central Montana, southern Alberta, and southwestern Saskatchewan, were pivotal in early stratigraphic investigations of the Western Interior of North America and are renowned to this day for their spectacular preservation of Late Cretaceous fossils, most notably dinosaurs. Correlation of the Judith River Formation in Montana with the Foremost, Oldman, and Dinosaur Park Formations (= Belly River Group) in Canada has been challenging for a variety of reasons, including lithostratigraphic complexities, legacy bentonite ages of limited comparability, and distinctly different stratigraphic models on opposite sides of the international border. An updated model calibrated with U-Pb zircon ages provides an improved framework for stratigraphic analysis. New geochronology indicates that the Oldman−Dinosaur Park discontinuity in Dinosaur Provincial Park correlates in age with the mid-Judith discontinuity in the Judith River Formation in Montana, which is interpreted as an expansion surface linked to a major pulse of accommodation and onset of the Bearpaw transgression at ca. 76.3 Ma. The regionally expressed shift in alluvial facies marking the mid-Judith discontinuity can be traced in well logs from Montana to southern Canada, where it loses distinction and transitions to a subsurface signature typical of the Oldman−Dinosaur Park discontinuity, which in turn can be traced north to Dinosaur Provincial Park and beyond. Across this expanse, both discontinuities parallel the Eagle/Milk River shoulder at approximately the same stratigraphic height, confirming their chronostratigraphic significance. These findings have clear implications for regional correlation and the evolution of alluvial depositional systems in a foreland basin setting, and they afford an opportunity to evaluate existing interpretations and advance understanding of the stratigraphy and paleontology of the Judith River−Belly River wedge. The term “Judith River−Belly River discontinuity” should be used henceforth to refer to the chronostratigraphically significant stratal discontinuity that subdivides the Judith River−Belly River wedge throughout the plains of north-central Montana, southern Alberta, and southwestern Saskatchewan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0050.009
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207