A Case Report of Cryoneurolysis for Dorsal Foot Pain and Toe Clawing in a Patient With Multiple Sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Toe clawing in patients with upper motor neuron disorders is often attributed to the flexor digitorum longus (FDL) and is a common presentation among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This movement may be painful due to altered pressure distribution and may increase the risk of falls, heighten energy expenditure during gait, and lower gait speed. Cryoneurolysis is a minimally invasive treatment that may be beneficial for pain and focal muscle hypertonicity. An ambulatory patient with MS was treated bilaterally with cryoneurolysis to the superficial fibular nerves for pain on the dorsum of the foot, and to the intramuscular tibial nerve motor branch to FDL for toe clawing. The patient felt that toe clawing was immediately reduced during gait and noted the ability to voluntarily spread their toes. The patient stated that the neuropathic pain on the dorsum of the foot was fully eliminated immediately post procedure. The patient reported improved confidence in their gait, maintained independence, and reduced toe clawing during a structured interview 12 weeks days after treatment. The effects lasted for 5.5 months before symptoms returned. Retreatment at six months reproduced the benefits. The patient reported a positive experience with cryoneurolysis for toe clawing and dorsal foot pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".