MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Current directions of development of domestic regulatory and technical documentation in the field of timber construction considering foreign experience

2023· article· en· W4385351308 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVestnik MGSU · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTechnology, Environment, Urban Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocumentationField (mathematics)Development (topology)Construction engineeringEngineeringCurrent (fluid)Architectural engineeringBusinessCivil engineeringComputer scienceMathematicsElectrical engineeringPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. The concentration of a huge amount of forest resources on the territory of the Russian Federation allows to expand significantly the usage of wood in the construction of both low-rise and high-rise buildings and structures. The main directions of development of normative and technical documentation (NTD) in the field of wooden construction, demanded by the professional community, are presented. Materials and methods. A survey of wooden house building market participants was conducted to identify the most urgent problems in the field of wood application in the construction industry. The NTD of the USA, Canada and EU countries regulating the usage of wood in the construction industry were reviewed. The best practices implemented in foreign NTD and capable of serving as a reference point in the process of modernization of the domestic regulatory framework in the subject area under study have been identified. The questions of fire safety, earthquake resistance, as well as modern construction materials and products based on wood, used in the market of building wooden structures (WS) are considered. The composition and structure of NTD of the Russian Federation in the field of wood construction have been analyzed. Results. The analysis of domestic and foreign NTD has revealed a significant deficit in the part of normative and methodological support of construction from materials and products based on wood. Recommendations on updating, cancellation or revision of domestic normative-technical documents have been developed. Conclusions. The necessity of intensification of applied scientific researches for updating of NTD, in particular normative-methodical manuals and recommendations is formulated and substantiated. Proposals for structuring the system of NTD RF in the field of construction of wooden structures have been developed. The system of state standards in this area should cover technical specifications for individual materials and wood products describing their physical and mechanical properties and design characteristics. The proposed structure of NTD in the field of wooden construction has the possibility of dynamic development taking into account the development of the nomenclature of materials, calculation methods and applied technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it