MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385367250 · doi:10.24867/ijiem-2014-1-106

Role of Drought Early Warning and Social Planning in Industrial Growth

2014· article· en· W4385367250 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Frank, Richard Frank, Ljiljana Popović

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsAlgonquin College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulation growthPreparednessPopulationClimate changeBusinessNatural resourceEnvironmental resource managementWater resourcesNatural resource economicsWarning systemEnvironmental planningGeographyEconomicsEngineeringEcologyManagementDemographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents challenges on industrial growth planning.A component of population change is dynamic in time and space, and has more dynamic components such as psychological, human preparedness, education level, and the most important one, which is the percentage of the population that is most vulnerable.Population change can influence growth due to the lack of trained and educated personnel, a rise of pressure on industrial sectors and variation in wages.The reason for this lies in the dependence relationship between the percentage of the working population and the other aspects of society such as the percentage of most vulnerable within the population and issues like population change.Industrial growth planning also depends on environmental issues and available resources.Climate change and climate extremes influence the availability of resources, especially water in case of drought.In all times the most important resource of all is water which has to be spread between different sectors and users wisely.Industrial development relies on good planning and proper management of all resources, natural and human.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering and ManagementSame topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207