MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385386949 · doi:10.18280/ria.370301

A Patient-Centered Text-Derived Neural Network Paradigm for Diagnosis of Schizophrenia

2023· article· en· W4385386949 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jesuloluwa Emmanuel Zaccheus, Ebenezer Olubunmi Ige, Hannah Chimere Ugo, Babatunde Fadipe, E. O. Nwoye

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Artificial neural networkNeurosciencePsychologyComputer scienceCognitive psychologyMedicineArtificial intelligencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A text-derived neural network for diagnosing Schizophrenia is illustrated in this paper.Schizophrenia is a continuous mental condition that affects the job performance, social relationship, and livelihood of individuals.Using DSM-V criterion for schizophrenia diagnosis, we collected data from medical records of 1205 patients in psychiatric hospitals (57% Schizophrenia and 43% Related Illnesses) and developed a neural network model.In order for the developed model to categorize the test data into classes, significant features from the acquired dataset were fed into it to identify indicators in the training data.The model diagnosed schizophrenia with 90% accuracy, 92% specificity, 84% precision and Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.97.These results are promising for schizophrenia diagnosis in the near future.The text-derived ANN developed is more accurate and faster computationally and can be used to generalize in the case of new data when compared to image-based classification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score0.891

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicMachine Learning in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207