MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385388390 · doi:10.1101/2023.07.27.550846

Differences in sperm swimming speed and morphology between the three genetic morphs in the ruff sandpiper

2023· preprint· en· W4385388390 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Bulla, Clemens Küpper, David B. Lank, Jana Albrechtová, Jasmine L. Loveland, Katrin Martin, Kim Teltscher, Margherita Cragnolini, Michael Lierz, Tomáš Albrecht, Wolfgang Forstmeier, Bart Kempenaers

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersMax-Planck-GesellschaftGrantová Agentura České Republiky
KeywordsBiologySpermZoologyPopulationSandpiperSperm competitionMatingEvolutionary biologyGeneticsDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The ruff sandpiper Calidris pugnax is a Palearctic lekking shorebird with three genetic morphs determined by an autosomal inversion. Male morphs differ strikingly in body size, ornaments, endocrinology and mating behavior. Aggressive Independents represent the ancestral haplotype, while female-mimicking Faeders and semi-cooperative Satellites are the inverted haplotypes. Because one inversion breakpoint is homozygous lethal, the inverted haplotypes cannot recombine and are expected to accumulate deleterious mutations. The inversion regions also harbor genes involved in spermatogenesis. However, it remains unknown whether the genetic differences between the morphs also translate into differences in sperm traits. Here, we use a captive-bred population of ruffs to compare sperm swimming speed and morphology among the morphs. Results Ruff sperm morphologically resembled those of passerines, but moved differently, vibrating from side to side while slowly moving forward, rather than rotating while moving forward. Faeder sperm moved the slowest, which is consistent with the prediction of genetic deterioration over time. However, against expectation, sperm of Independents did not seem to be of the highest quality, i.e., their sperm were not the fastest nor the least variable, and they had sperm with the shortest tail and midpiece. Although the midpiece contains the energy-producing mitochondria, sperm midpiece length was not associated with sperm swimming speed. Instead, two of three velocity metrics weakly positively correlated with head length (absolute and relative). Conclusions The three genetically determined ruff morphs showed subtle differences in swimming speed and in the length of some sperm components. However, the between-morph differences in sperm swimming speed were not linked to the differences in morphology. We conclude that there is at best limited evidence for lower-quality sperm in the morphs that carry the inversion, and suggest that the potential for the evolution of morph-specific sperm adaptations may be limited in this system. Lay Summary The ruff sandpiper is a shorebird that exhibits three genetically distinct types of males, which differ markedly in body size, ornaments, hormones, and mating behavior. Aggressive Independents represent the type that evolved first. Semi-cooperative Satellites and female-mimicking Faeders evolved later through a specific type of genetic rearrangement called an ‘inversion’, in which a segment of a chromosome reversed in orientation. Due to the nature of this inversion, Satellite and Faeder chromosomes are expected to deteriorate over time. However, it remains unclear whether the genetic differences between these morphs, which affect physiological and behavioral traits, also translate into differences in sperm traits. We used a captive population of ruffs to compare sperm swimming speed and length measurements between the three types of males. Faeder sperm was the slowest, which is consistent with expectations based on genetic deterioration over time. However, against our expectations, the sperm of Independents does not appear to have better performance characteristics. Although the midpiece of a sperm is responsible for energy production, the length of the midpiece did not relate to sperm swimming speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction→French-language works237,207→