MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385391033 · doi:10.58286/28196

Validation through field data of LineCore, a lightweight Eddy-current sensor for the early detection of corrosion of ACSRs

2023· article· en· W4385391033 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jonathan Bellemare, Meysam Hassanipour, Stéphane Godin, Gilles Rousseau, Nicolas Pouliot

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch and Review Journal of Nondestructive Testing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCorrosionEddy currentMaterials scienceZincNondestructive testingElectrical conductorEddy-current testingField (mathematics)Computer scienceTransmission lineForensic engineeringComposite materialMetallurgyElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 2014, Hydro-Québec is using LineCore technology for the early detection of corrosion in ACSRs. This paper features, for the first time, an extensive validation based on measures on in-lab prepared samples and metallographic analysis on field collected samples. The experimental validation protocol is presented which resulted in 21 cuts and thousands of zinc layer thickness measurements. Key finding is the very high variability of zinc layer thicknesses observed on all samples. Correlation between LineCore data and metallographic cuts is established. More specifically, LineCore measurement features a bias toward local minimum values of zinc thickness on the strands, which can be indicative of localized corrosion initiation. By sharing these results, the authors wish to initiate discussion that could help standardize the usage of this novel NDT technology for the assessment of transmission line conductors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.233
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch and Review Journal of Nondestructive TestingSame topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207