MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385394420

Tandem lesion was risk factor for endovascular treatment in acute basilar artery occlusion: a single center retrospective observational study

2020· article· en· W4385394420 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xuan Sun, Feng Gao, Xu Tong, Yiming Deng, Ning Ma, Dapeng Mo, Ligang Song, Lian Liu, Xiao⁃chuan HUO, Xiaotong Xu, Zhong⁃rong MIAO

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObservational studySingle CenterCenter (category theory)OcclusionRetrospective cohort studyLesionBasilar arteryEndovascular treatmentRisk factorRadiologySurgeryInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To evaluate whether patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) tandem lesion could affect the clinical outcome after receiving endovascular treatment (EVT) in a high ⁃ volume stroke center. Methods A total of 187 consecutive patients with acute BAO receiving EVT from January 2012 to July 2018 were recruited in this study. The patients were categorized into 2 groups with (25 cases) or without (162 cases) tandem lesion. Preoperative Posterior Circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (pc ⁃ ASPECTS) and Pons ⁃ Midbrairn Index (PMI) were used to evaluate the cerebral infarction range, and Post ⁃ Traffic Score and American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR) grading were used to evaluate the posterior circulation collateral compensation after actue BAO. The main prognostic indicators were immediate postoperative vascular recanalization rate, functional independence and prognosis 90 d after treatment, and the main safety endpoints were intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) incidence 7 d after surgery and mortality 90 d after treatment. Results In tandem group, the lesions were mainly located at the beginning of the basilar artery (including the intracranial segment of the vertebral artery) and at the distal end ( P = 0.000), and the proportion of intracranial arterial stenosis was lower ( P = 0.000). Among the 25 patients with tandem lesion, 21 took the Dirty ⁃ road route and 4 took the Clean ⁃ road route. The proportion of stent thrombectomy ( P = 0.030) and intraoperative intravenous injection of tirofibana ( P = 0.028) was lower, the proportion of stent implantation was higher ( P = 0.005), the proportion of vascular recanalization after treatment was lower ( P = 0.001), and the mortality rate was higher 90 d after treatment ( P = 0.002). Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that acute BAO tandem lesion had a lower immediate vascular recanalization rate ( OR = 0.050, 95% CI: 0.010-0.530; P = 0.012) and a higher mortality 90 d after treatment (OR = 17.320, 95% CI: 2.700-111.040; P = 0.003). Conclusions Tandem lesion seems to be associated with low rate of recanalization and high rate of mortality in patients with acute BAO. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672⁃6731.2020.05.005

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.319
GPT teacher head0.504
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→