MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385396492 · doi:10.35774/visnyk2023.02.119

Implementation of COSO-ERM internal control integrated concept in Ukraine

2023· article· en· W4385396492 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHerald of Economics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Business Development Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl (management)Production (economics)AgricultureInternal controlBusinessOrder (exchange)Agricultural productivityIndustrial organizationOperations managementEconomicsManagementFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. At the current stage of development, the internal control system plays an important role in ensuring the effective functioning and implementation of users’ needs for information in order to make informed management decisions regarding the cost of crop production. In recent years, many scientific works have been devoted to the development of internal control at agricultural enterprises, including taking into account the adaptation of foreign experience of countries such as the USA, Japan, Germany, Poland, and Canada into domestic practice. In turn, this determines the relevance of the study of the integrated COSO-ERM model with the aim of its implementation at agricultural enterprises of Ukraine.The purpose – characterize and adapt the integrated concept of COSO-ERM internal control to the domestic practice of enterprises.Methods (methodology). The theoretical and methodological basis of scientific research is analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, analogy, abstraction, concretization, comparison, monographic, systematic and logical methods.The results. Approaches to the organization of the system of internal control of the cost of production of crop production were studied, taking into account the principles of building its structure according to the integrated COSO-ERM model of internal control. The foreign experience of conducting internal control of the cost of crop production was adapted to the domestic practice of enterprises. Control measures have been developed to prevent or reduce agricultural production risks affecting production costs.Prospects. In the future, it is advisable to more thoroughly cover the methodology and organization of internal control of production activities of agricultural enterprises in Ukraine and in foreign countries that have positive experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it