MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385405053 · doi:10.7325/galemys.2010.1.a3

Análisis de la alimentación y distribución del visón americano (Neovison vison) y de la nutria (Lutra lutra) en la población simpátrica del río Moros (Sistema Central, Segovia)

2010· article· en· W4385405053 on OpenAlexaff
Javier Morales, David Díez, Miguel Lizana

Bibliographic record

VenueGalemys Spanish Journal of Mammalogy · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLutraOtterMinkAmerican minkTributaryMustelidaeGeographyEcologyFisheryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The distribution of the American mink (Neovison vison) has been continuous in the last decades in the river Moros basin (Segovia) and in its tributary streams and reservoirs at all altitudes , while the otter distribution (Lutra lutra) is linked to the river Moros, mainly to the middle course, alter the recolonization which began less than two decades ago and with a seasonal presence in the high altitude stretches of the river. The trophic ecology was studied by the analysis of 321 feces (spraints) (130 of otters and 191 of mink) collected during 13 months in 5 study sites located 64 in the high and middle stretches of the river, including 2 small mountain dams and a large dam in the middle stretch with a great human presence. Fish are the fundamental prey of the otters throughout the year and at all altitudes, the rest prey are accidentals. Mammals and fish are the fundamental prey for the American mink. The diversity of the otter’s diet is considerably smaller than that of the mink in all the stretches of the river. The overlap of the diets between otters and minks throughout the study is over 83%. Considering the sites in sympatry for both species is greater than 89%. The distribution of otters in the river Moros seems to be stable in the last samplings. The American mink distribution did not become reduced in the area and it is present in all the same river courses in which it was detected more than 25 years ago. Trapping minks has been insufficient to control this alien carnivore, which seems to tolerate the presence of otters in seasonal sympatry avoiding competition for trophic resources and shelters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGalemys Spanish Journal of MammalogySame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207