Vers des stratégies de plaidoyer structurel : une étude sur le processus de plaidoyer chez les infirmières en santé communautaire
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to reduce social inequities in health, nurses need to move from patient advocacy to policy advocacy. Literature reports many barriers when nurses try to address the structural level of policy advocacy. Very little empirical research exists to show how nurses respond to these barriers and the resulting impact on the effectiveness of policy advocacy. This study characterized the types and the process of advocacy practiced by community health nurses. A collaborative ethnography with 21 nurses showed that their policy advocacy was often dismissed, leading to negative consequences such as less policy advocacy attempts, changes in their clinical evaluation with patients and personal experiences of moral distress. We argue that structural change will only occur when collective advocacy will be supported by organizations, therefore reducing inequities that affect both community health and working conditions of nurses. Afin de réduire les iniquités sociales de santé, les infirmières doivent dépasser le plaidoyer axé sur les individus en investissant des stratégies de plaidoyer ciblant les structures et les politiques. Dans cet article, nous soutenons que de ne pas exercer de plaidoyer structurel peut amener des conséquences néfastes pour les infirmières elles-mêmes et les communautés qu’elles desservent. Cette étude caractérise les types et le processus de plaidoyer exercés par les infirmières en santé communautaire. Une ethnographie collaborative avec 21 infirmières montre que leurs tentatives de plaidoyer structurel étaient ignorées, décourageant les tentatives futures, entraînant des changements dans leur évaluation clinique et des expériences de détresse morale. Nous argumentons que le changement structurel surviendra seulement lorsque les stratégies de plaidoyer seront collectivisées et soutenues par les organisations de santé, réduisant ainsi les iniquités affectant à la fois la santé communautaire et les conditions de travail des infirmières.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it