Efficient Latent Space Compression for Lightning-Fast Fine-Tuning and Inference of Transformer-Based Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a technique to reduce the number of parameters in a transformer-based encoder–decoder architecture by incorporating autoencoders. To discover the optimal compression, we trained different autoencoders on the embedding space (encoder’s output) of several pre-trained models. The experiments reveal that reducing the embedding size has the potential to dramatically decrease the GPU memory usage while speeding up the inference process. The proposed architecture was included in the BART model and tested for summarization, translation, and classification tasks. The summarization results show that a 60% decoder size reduction (from 96 M to 40 M parameters) will make the inference twice as fast and use less than half of GPU memory during fine-tuning process with only a 4.5% drop in R-1 score. The same trend is visible for translation and partially for classification tasks. Our approach reduces the GPU memory usage and processing time of large-scale sequence-to-sequence models for fine-tuning and inference. The implementation and checkpoints are available on GitHub.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it