Late laryngeal dysfunction in head and neck cancer survivors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Head and neck cancer (HNC) survivorship issues are areas of increasing research interest. Laryngeal dysfunction in HNC patients is particularly important given the importance of the larynx in voice, swallowing, and airway protection. The objective of our study is to characterize late laryngeal dysfunction in a cohort of long‐term HNC survivors. Methods HNC survivors who were at least 2 years post‐treatment were recruited prospectively for standard collection of videolaryngoscopy findings, videofluoroscopic swallowing studies, and assessment of clinical outcomes. Descriptive statistics were performed and clinical presentation and outcomes were compared between survivors >10 years and <10 years post‐treatment. Additional factor analysis to correlate clinical outcomes with clinical variables was performed. Results Thirty participants were analyzed with a mean age of 66 years. The majority were male (80%) patients treated for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (67%). Within the cohort, 43% underwent primary chemoradiation therapy and had 13% radiation alone. Common presenting symptoms included swallowing dysfunction (83%), voice change (67%), and chronic cough (17%). Laryngeal findings on video laryngoscopy include vocal fold motion abnormalities (VFMA) in over half of participants (61%) and mucosal changes in 20%. A weak correlation was found between time since treatment and laryngeal dysfunction (r = .182, p = .34), and no correlation was found between age, sex, time since treatment, or primary site and the presence or absence of VFMA, G‐tube status, or tracheostomy‐tube status. Conclusion Late laryngeal dysfunction in HNC survivors contributes to significant morbidity, is difficult to treat, and remains static decades after treatment for their original cancer. Lay Summary The voice‐box, or the larynx, plays an important role in voice, swallowing and airway protection. It is particularly vulnerable to radiation‐related damage and changes. This study demonstrates the sequelae of long‐term damage of the larynx in head and cancer survivors. Level of Evidence IV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".