MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385432050 · doi:10.55905/rcssv12n1-020

“Entre os muros da escola”: uma tentativa de análise

2023· article· pt· W4385432050 on OpenAlexaff
Aline Christine de SOUZA, Gracieli Neja, Maria Ester Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Caribeña de Ciencias Sociales · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Pedagogy and Practices
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O insucesso/fracasso escolar foi e continua sendo objeto de discussões e de análises. Em muitos casos, a tendência é apontar para um “culpado”; ora a criança, ora o professor. Assim sendo, neste artigo, o objetivo foi ponderar sobre esse tema a partir da análise do filme francês Entre os muros da escola, dirigido por Laurente Cantet e que retrata o cotidiano de uma escola pública da periferia parisiense. Centramo-nos na personagem Souleymane e nos aspectos envolvidos em seu insucesso/fracasso escolar. A análise e a reflexão teórica evidenciaram que, no caso de Souleymane, a escola o rotulava como indisciplinado, porém, desconhecia a sua realidade. Outros aspectos que impactavam a sua aprendizagem (e a de outros) puderam ser constatados: a escola não fornecia um método de ensino adequado às dificuldades dos alunos; os docentes não estavam preparados para lidar com as diferenças do público discente (culturais, econômicas etc.); os alunos eram pouco estimulados a desenvolverem suas potencialidades e aspectos econômicos e familiares influenciavam seu comportamento. O resultado dessa análise pode fomentar outras discussões que contribuam para se pensar os vários elementos intrínsecos ao processo de ensino e aprendizagem e como superar aquilo que impacta o desenvolvimento dos alunos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Caribeña de Ciencias SocialesSame topicEducation Pedagogy and PracticesFrench-language works237,207