MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385470674 · doi:10.12723/mjs.59.3

Identification of a rare class of emission-line stars in transition between pre-main sequence to Main Sequence phase

2021· article· en· W4385470674 on OpenAlexaff
Suman Bhattacharyya, Blesson Mathew, Gourav Banerjee, R. Anusha, K. T. Paul, Sreeja S. Kartha

Bibliographic record

VenueMapana Journal of Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStarsT Tauri starHerbig Ae/Be starPhysicsSequence (biology)AstrophysicsK-type main-sequence starMain sequencePhase (matter)AstronomyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over time, pre-main-sequence (PMS) stars evolve into main-sequence (MS) stars. Stars evolving from PMS to MS phase is a significant subject of research that aims to better understand stellar phases and their properties. Existing literature shows a lack of study of stars in between PMS and MS phase. 'We focused on what belongs in the midst of these two phases. Classical Be (CBe) and Herbig Ae/Be (HAeBe) stars, corresponding to MS and PMS phases, are two well known categories of emission-line stars. Through optical and infrared photometric analysis of a sample of 2167 CBe and 225 HAeBe stars, we identified 98 such rare stars which are in transition between PMS and MS phase. Those rare stars are termed as 'Transition Phase' (TP) candidates in our study. Using the machine learning approach, the potential of the identified TP candidates was verified. 'This article provides a brief overview

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMapana Journal of SciencesSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207