Comprehensive dissection of meiotic DNA double-strand breaks and crossovers in cucumber
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Meiotic recombination drives genetic diversity and crop genome optimization. In plant breeding, parents with favorable traits are crossed to create elite varieties. Different hybridizations produce diverse types of segment reshuffling between homologous chromosomes. However, little is known about the factors that cause hybrid-specific changes in crossovers (COs). Here, we constructed 2 F2 populations from crosses between a semiwild and 2 domesticated cucumber (Cucumis sativus) accessions and examined CO events. COs mainly occurred around genes and differed unevenly along chromosomes between the 2 hybrids. Fine-scale CO distributions were suppressed in regions of heterozygous structural variations (SVs) and were accelerated by high sequence polymorphism. C. sativus RADiation sensitive 51A (CsRAD51A) binding, histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) modification, chromatin accessibility, and hypomethylation were positively associated with global CO landscapes and in local DNA double-strand break (DSB) hotspots and genes. The frequency and suppression of COs could be roughly predicted based on multiomic information. Differences in CO events between hybrids could be partially traced to distinct genetic and epigenetic features and were significantly associated with specific DSB hotspots and heterozygous SVs. Our findings identify the genomic and epigenetic features that contribute to CO formation and hybrid-specific divergence in cucumber and provide theoretical support for selecting parental combinations and manipulating recombination events at target genomic regions during plant breeding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".