MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385480783 · doi:10.2118/217438-pa

Reservoir and Fracture Characterization for Enhanced Geothermal Systems: A Case Study Using Multifractured Wells at the Utah Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy Site

2023· article· en· W4385480783 on OpenAlexaff
D. Zeinabady, Christopher R. Clarkson

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeothermal gradientPetroleum engineeringHydraulic fracturingGeologyFracture (geology)Permeability (electromagnetism)Geothermal energyInjection wellHydraulic conductivityPetrologyReservoir simulationMicroseismSteam injectionGeotechnical engineeringSoil scienceGeophysicsSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary For enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), multistage hydraulic fracturing along a deviated or horizontal well is a key technology used to create a high-conductivity fracture network between injection and production wells in deep, low-permeability geothermal reservoirs. The purpose of the created fracture network is to allow for the efficient transfer of fluid, heated by the geothermal reservoir, from the injection to the production well; therefore, well spacing (between injection and production wells) and hydraulic fracturing must be designed not only to promote connectivity between well pairs but also to mitigate thermal short-circuiting and thermal breakthrough. Analysis of post-fracture pressure decay (PFPD) data measured after each stage of a hydraulic fracturing treatment can be used to provide critical reservoir and fracture parameters required for well and hydraulic fracturing design optimization; this method provides a low-cost alternative and complementary approach to in-situ observation techniques, such as core-through experiments, fiber optics, or image logs in offset wells. Until now, PFPD has primarily been applied to multifractured horizontal wells (MFHWs) completed in low-permeability hydrocarbon reservoirs. The goal of this study is therefore to develop a methodology to estimate fracture and reservoir parameters using stage-by-stage PFPD data associated with EGS projects. An analytical model is proposed herein to estimate fracturing fluid efficiency, fracture length, average fracture aperture, average fracture conductivity, and reservoir permeability for different possible fracture geometries in EGS reservoirs. PFPD data collected for three hydraulic fracture stages in the injection well at the Utah Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) site were analyzed to demonstrate the practical application of the proposed method. The results of this study indicate that, due to the presence of natural fractures in the target (granitic) reservoir, the hydraulic fracturing treatment (using slickwater) in the openhole section resulted in low fracturing fluid efficiency and small hydraulic fractures. In contrast, hydraulic fracturing treatments conducted in the perforated casedhole wellbore resulted in higher fracturing fluid efficiency and created larger hydraulic fractures even with smaller injected volumes. The results of the PFPD analysis were confirmed using a Formation MicroScanner image log and microseismic data collected during each stage of hydraulic fracturing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE JournalSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207