<i>Isocitrate dehydrogenase</i> wt and IDHmut adult-type diffuse gliomas display distinct alterations in ribosome biogenesis and 2’O-methylation of ribosomal RNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-grade adult-type diffuse gliomas (HGGs) constitute a heterogeneous group of aggressive tumors that are mostly incurable. Recent advances highlighting the contribution of ribosomes to cancer development have offered new clinical perspectives. Here, we uncovered that isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)wt and IDHmut HGGs display distinct alterations of ribosome biology, in terms of rRNA epitranscriptomics and ribosome biogenesis, which could constitute novel hallmarks that can be exploited for the management of these pathologies. METHODS: We analyzed (1) the ribosomal RNA 2'O-ribose methylation (rRNA 2'Ome) using RiboMethSeq and in-house developed bioinformatics tools (https://github.com/RibosomeCRCL/ribomethseq-nfandrRMSAnalyzer) on 3 independent cohorts compiling 71 HGGs (IDHwt n = 30, IDHmut n = 41) and 9 non-neoplastic samples, (2) the expression of ribosome biogenesis factors using medium throughput RT-qPCR as a readout of ribosome biogenesis, and (3) the sensitivity of 5 HGG cell lines to RNA Pol I inhibitors (CX5461, BMH-21). RESULTS: Unsupervised analysis demonstrated that HGGs could be distinguished based on their rRNA 2'Ome epitranscriptomic profile, with IDHwt glioblastomas displaying the most significant alterations of rRNA 2'Ome at specific sites. In contrast, IDHmut HGGs are largely characterized by an overexpression of ribosome biogenesis factors compared to non-neoplastic tissues or IDHwt glioblastomas. Finally, IDHmut HGG-derived spheroids display higher cytotoxicity to CX5461 than IDHwt glioblastoma, while all HGG spheroids display a similar cytotoxicity to BMH-21. CONCLUSIONS: In HGGs, IDH mutational status is associated with specific alterations of the ribosome biology and with distinct sensitivities to RNA Pol I inhibitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".