MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385483342 · doi:10.18192/jpp.v32i2.6849

Changing Directions

2023· article· en· W4385483342 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Darris Drake

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Prisoners on Prisons · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Leadership and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A s I stare at my door which rarely opens, the reality of solitary confi nement weighs heavily upon my shoulders.Is this rehabilitation?There are days when I do not hear my own voice and, as days pass, I fi nd myself more frequently answering my own mental contemplations.Without a strong mind, one can easily tumble into a mental crisis.That is a regular occurrence around here, evident by the screams of desperation, followed by the frantic kicks and punches which rattle the same doors at which I am staring.The unbudging steel fuelling the fl ames of helplessness, charring their resolve.Somehow this environment is not alien to me.It is by far not the highlight of my existence, rather it has become a minor inconvenience.Writing those last two words was not easy -to say that the loss of my freedom is a minor convenience exposes my institutionalization.I have spent a lifetime in cells just like this one and, when I was free, the desperation was still present.After the life I lived, immersed in the criminal subculture, things like desperation, violence, drug addiction, resentment, greed, and death became my social norms.To experience anything outside of that was alien.I have never valued societal norms or felt included in normative society, so my transition to the subculture was a seamless one.I think most people mistakenly assume that everyone knows and understands the societal norms, and should therefore abide by them.However, when you are not provided the stability to develop your own values and a platform to pursue them, then societal norms become chains of oppression.I always felt that society was impressing its will upon me, and as a child I had no way to express this feeling, so I rebelled.As an adolescent, anytime I felt an authority (whether institutional or parental), I began to fi ght that noose and thrash against it.That feeling of helplessness was the source of my anger.Not knowing how to fi ght it, I began to physically impose my will, whether on my peers or anyone in whom I perceived weakness.I used aggression to hide the scared, insecure child I really was.I have harmed a lot of people running from those feelings of helplessness, some of whom I love.Two years ago, I made the decision to change my life.Deep down, I did not believe it was possible.My experiences caused me to develop a low sense of self-worth.I began to educate myself and take some painful trips down memory lane to fi nd the root causes of my behaviour.Learning how to heal from the inside-out has been a priceless tool on my journey.Though there are still times, such as this, where my intellect does not apply and my

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Prisoners on PrisonsSame topicEducational Leadership and PracticesFrench-language works237,207