MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385492248 · doi:10.1186/s12884-023-05750-y

Predicting maternal healthcare seeking behaviour in Afghanistan: exploring sociodemographic factors and women’s knowledge of severity of illness

2023· article· en· W4385492248 on OpenAlexaff
Essa Tawfiq, Mohammad Daud Azimi, Aeraj Feroz, Ahmad Shakir Hadad, Mohammad Samim Soroush, Massoma Jafari, Marzia Salam Yaftali, Sayed Ataullah Saeedzai

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHealth careReproductive medicinePregnancyOdds ratioFamily medicineDemographyPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Little is known whether women's knowledge of perceived severity of illness and sociodemographic characteristics of women influence healthcare seeking behavior for maternal health services in Afghanistan. The aim of this study was to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: Data were used from the Afghanistan Health Survey 2018. Women's knowledge in terms of danger signs or symptoms during pregnancy was assessed. The signs or symptoms were bleeding, swelling of the body, headache, fever, or any other danger sign or symptom (e.g., high blood pressure). A categorical variable of knowledge score was created. The outcome variables were defined as ≥ 4 ANC vs. 0-3 ANC; ≥ 4 PNC vs. 0-3 PNC visits; institutional vs. non-institutional deliveries. A multivariable generalized linear model (GLM) was used. RESULTS: Data were used from 9,190 ever-married women, aged 13-49 years, who gave birth in the past two years. It was found that 56%, 22% and 2% of women sought healthcare for institutional delivery, ≥ 4 ANC, ≥ 4 PNC visits, respectively, and that women's knowledge is a strong predictor of healthcare seeking [odds ratio (OR)1.77(1.54-2.05), 2.28(1.99-2.61), and 2.78 (2.34-3.32) on knowledge of 1, 2, and 3-5 signs or symptoms, respectively, in women with ≥ 4 ANC visits when compared with women who knew none of the signs or symptoms. In women with ≥ 4 PNC visits, it was 1.80(1.12-2.90), 2.22(1.42-3.48), and 3.33(2.00-5.54), respectively. In women with institutional deliveries, it was 1.49(1.32-1.68), 2.02(1.78-2.28), and 2.34(1.95-2.79), respectively. Other strong predictors were women's education level, multiparity, residential areas (urban vs. rural), socioeconomic status, access to mass media (radio, TV, the internet), access of women to health workers for birth, and decision-making for women where to deliver. However, age of women was not a strong predictor. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that pregnant women's healthcare seeking behaviour is influenced by women's knowledge of danger signs and symptoms during pregnancy, women's education, socioeconomic status, access to media, husband's, in-laws' and relatives' decisions, residential area, multiparity, and access to health workers. The findings have implications for promoting safe motherhood and childbirth practices through improving women's knowledge, education, and social status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthSame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207