MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385497061 · doi:10.18192/jpp.v32i2.6854

Gender Not Fit for Prisons: On The Incompatibility of Gender as a Means to Segregate Prisoners

2023· article· en· W4385497061 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dwayne Antojado

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Prisoners on Prisons · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Security, and Conflict
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRMIT UniversityAustralian Catholic UniversityUniversity of Canterbury
KeywordsPsychologyCriminologySociologyGender studiesSocial psychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prisons worldwide, including in Australia, are segregated based on biological sex.On the other hand, feminist scholarship challenges gender within the binary of man and woman, arguing instead that individuals undergo the process of "becoming" and are not merely born.In this space, tensions exist for transgender individuals interacting with prisons.Although many policy initiatives are being established by correctional authorities world-wide, these innovations are often criticized for failing to translate into reality.It is argued here that prisons must reimagine the way they categorize individuals based on binary conceptions of gender.Instead, they must view gender through the optics of transgenderism, where it is conceived as something fl uid, changing, and mutable.82 Journal of Prisoners on Prisons, Volume 32(2), 2023 Moreover, this paper centralizes the work of Singer (2013) in interrogating the incongruity of transgenderism within binary schemas, particularly within broader social institutions. INCONGRUITY OF TRANSGENDERISM"Classifi catory schemas that ascribed gender attribution, enforce gender socialization, and assign sex at birth is usually dimorphic: male/female" (Singer, 2013, p. 2).As a result, these schemas make bodies socially useful, culturally legible, and productive under diff erent regimes of power (Singer, 2013).The inability for transgenderism to be articulated within these understandings, and the incongruity between bodies, identities, assigned gender, and gender expression (Singer, 2013), explicates the institutional betrayal of social life, government, and its processes in actively marginalizing transgender people through discriminative, exclusive, and phobic social structures.Of these, prison is a salient example, causing deleterious eff ects for transgender people (Maycock, 2020).Incorporating academic understandings gained through transgender studies into interrogative discussions of structural transphobia, including the experiences of transgender people as violators of sex and gender norms (Singer, 2013), is key to enriching public policy initiatives geared towards mitigating the eff ects of how gender is socially constructed.Moreover, it can inform policy initiatives to see transgenderism as a progressive and enriching tool forwarding the feminist project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Prisoners on PrisonsSame topicGender, Security, and ConflictFrench-language works237,207