Effect of Spirulina and Coenzyme Q-10 Addition to Extenders on Canine Spermiogram
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study was aimed to determine the effect of addition of antioxidants to semen extender on Labrador dog semen preserved at 4˚C.The semen was evaluated for volume, colour and concentration, and extended with tris-egg yolk-citric acid containing Spirulina at 10 µg/ml (SP), Coenzyme Q-10 at 0.5 (CO) µMol/ml, a combination extender with 10 µg/ml Spirulina and 0.5 µMol/ml Coenzyme Q-10 (SC) and no antioxidant (CON).The extended semen was evaluated for acrosomal integrity, mitochondrial activity and lipid peroxidation assay at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours.It was observed that, up to 24 hours there was no significant difference between the antioxidants' and control groups.However, at 48 and 72 hours, the addition of antioxidants showed better spermiogram compared to control group, and the combination of antioxidants showed better results when compared to individual antioxidants at 48 and 72 hours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".