MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385503202 · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2023.112266

Frailty in relation to the risk of carotid atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events in Chinese community-dwelling older adults: A five-year prospective cohort study

2023· article· en· W4385503202 on OpenAlexaff
Chunxiu Wang, Xianghua Fang, Zhe Tang, Hua Yang, Zhongying Zhang, Xiang Gu, Beibei Liu, Kun Yang, Xunming Ji, Xiaowei Song

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Gerontology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsFraser HealthSurrey Memorial Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProspective cohort studyInternal medicineHazard ratioStroke (engine)Proportional hazards modelCardiologyMyocardial infarctionCohortCohort studyCarotid ultrasonographyConfidence intervalCarotid arteries

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frailty, as estimated by accumulated health deficits, in association with the symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis and in relation to five-year cardiovascular (CVD) outcomes. METHODS: This is a five-year prospective cohort study. Secondary analysis of data from the Beijing Longitudinal Study on Aging. Community-dwelling people aged 55+ years (n = 1257) have been followed between 2009 and 2014, and having carotid ultrasonography examinations with no CVD events at baseline. Frailty was quantified using the deficit accumulation-based frailty index (FI), constructed from 37 health deficits assessed at baseline. The association between the degree of frailty and carotid atherosclerosis was examined using odds ratios (OR) with multivariate logistic regression analyses. Effects of frailty on the probability of five-year cardiovascular events and mortality were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR). The analyses were adjusted for demographics, baseline carotid atherosclerosis status, and CVD risk factors. RESULTS: The FI showed characteristic properties and was independently associated with the major carotid atherosclerosis symptoms, including carotid artery intima-media thickening (the most frail vs. the least frail: OR = 4.39: 1.98-7.82), carotid plaque (OR = 3.41: 1.28-6.54), and carotid plaque stability (OR = 1.19, 95 % CI: 1.01-3.59). Compared with the least frail, the most frail individuals were more likely to develop a cardiovascular event in five years, including myocardial infarction (HR = 3.38, 95 % CI = 1.84-6.19), stroke (HR = 1.26, 95 % CI = 1.00-5.87), CVD death (HR = 6.33, 95 % CI = 1.69-11.02), and all-cause death (HR = 5.95, 95 % CI = 2.74-8.95). CONCLUSION: Deficit accumulation was closely associated with carotid atherosclerosis risks and strongly predicted five-year CVD events. The frailty index can be used to help identify older adults at high risks of CVD for improved preventive healthcare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental GerontologySame topicFrailty in Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207