Sequential Release and Muscle Slide of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Results in Linear Gains in Tendon Mobility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: The purposes of this study were to examine the technique of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle slide for the treatment of rotator cuff tears and to quantify the amount of release and resultant tendon excursion at their insertion sites in cadavers. Methods: Twelve shoulders in 6 human cadavers were dissected. Their average age at time of death was 84 years. Though a large open posterior incision, artificial rotator cuff tears were created, if not already present. Standard arthroscopic release was completed. Muscle slide technique was then performed for the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles in quartiles, with tendon excursion measured at each interval. Results: The average muscle length from its most medial border to the tendinous insertion was 130 mm and 145.8 mm for the supraspinatus and infraspinatus, respectively. Progressive release of the muscle origin from lateral to medial in 25% increments corresponded to a 6.47-mm lateral shift of the tendon to a maximum of 25.8 mm before complete release of the supraspinatus muscle was achieved. For the infraspinatus, it was an average of 5.38 mm at each 25% interval to a maximum of 21.5 mm. The only restraint to mobility were the motor branches attached to the undersurface of each muscle belly. Conclusions: An additional 25.8 mm (supraspinatus) and 21.5 mm (infraspinatus) of tendon excursion was produced when 100% of the muscle was released from its underlying fossa. At that juncture, tendon excursion was limited by tension placed on each muscle's respective neurovascular supply. Furthermore, sequential release of each muscle resulted in a predictable and consistent gain in tendon mobility, with an average of 6.47 mm and 5.38 mm for each quartile of muscle release in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus from lateral to medial. Clinical Relevance: Tension at the repair site is a contributing factor to poor outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of massive rotator cuff tears. This study quantifies the tendon mobility that may be gained following additional muscle slide techniques, and the addition of this technique may contribute to a tension-free repair.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".