MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385510973 · doi:10.1051/ject/202153097

STS/SCA/AmSECT/SABM Update to the Clinical Practice Guidelines on Patient Blood Management

2021· article· en· W4385510973 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Tibi, R. Scott McClure, Jiapeng Huang, Robert A. Baker, David Fitzgerald, C. David Mazer, Marc E. Stone, Danny Chu, Alfred H. Stammers, Tim Dickinson, Linda Shore‐Lesserson, Victor A. Ferraris, Scott Firestone, Kalie Kissoon, Susan D. Moffatt‐Bruce

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of ExtraCorporeal Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood transfusion and management
Canadian institutionsRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of CanadaUniversity of TorontoUniversity of OttawaLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlood managementMedicineClinical PracticeIntensive care medicineInternal medicineFamily medicineBlood transfusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

InterventionACC/AHA Class and LevelPreoperative identification of high-risk patients should be performed, and all available preoperative and perioperative measures of blood conservation should be undertaken in this group as they account for most blood products transfused. Class I, Level AIt is reasonable to discontinue low-intensity antiplatelet drugs (e.g., aspirin) only in purely elective patients without ACS before operation with the expectation that blood transfusion will be reduced.Class IIA, Level A Minimization of phlebotomy through reduction in blood sampling volumes and frequencies is a reasonable means of blood conservation.Class IIA, Level B-NR (nonrandomized) The addition of a P2Y12 inhibitor to aspirin therapy, if indicated, in the immediate postoperative care of CABG patients before ensuring surgical hemostasis may increase bleeding and the need for surgical reexploration, and is not recommended until the risk of bleeding has abated.Class III: No benefit, Level C-LD (limited data)Use of 1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP) may be reasonable to attenuate excessive bleeding and transfusion in certain patients with demonstrable and specific platelet dysfunction known to respond to this agent (e.g., uremic or CPB-induced platelet dysfunction, type I von Willebrand disease).Class IIB, Level B-NR Plasma transfusion is reasonable in patients with serious bleeding in the context of multiple or single coagulation factor deficiencies when safer fractionated products are not available.Class IIA, Level B-NR Prophylactic use of plasma in cardiac operations in the absence of coagulopathy is not indicated, does not reduce blood loss, and exposes patients to unnecessary risks and complications of allogeneic blood component transfusion. Class III: Harm, Level AWhen allogeneic blood transfusion is needed, it is reasonable to use leukoreduced donor blood, if available.Class IIA, Level B-R (randomized) Use of recombinant factor VIIa concentrate may be considered for the management of intractable nonsurgical bleeding that is unresponsive to routine hemostatic therapy after cardiac procedures using CPB.Class IIB, Level B-NR Antithrombin III concentrates are indicated to reduce plasma transfusion in patients with antithrombinmediated heparin resistance immediately before CPB. Class I, Level AIn high-risk patients with known malignancy who require CPB, blood salvage using centrifugation of salvaged blood from the operative field may be considered when allogeneic transfusion is required.Class IIB, Level B-NR Centrifugation of pump-salvaged blood is reasonable for minimizing post-CPB allogeneic RBC transfusion.Class IIA, Level A Use of modified ultrafiltration may be reasonable for blood conservation and reducing postoperative blood loss in adult cardiac operations using CPB.Class IIB, Level B-R Routine use of red cell salvage using centrifugation is helpful for blood conservation in cardiac operations using CPB.Class I, Level A Direct reinfusion of shed mediastinal blood from postoperative chest tube drainage is not recommended as a means of blood conservation and may cause harm.Class III: Harm, Level B-NR A comprehensive multimodality blood conservation program led by a multidisciplinary team of healthcare providers should be part of any patient blood management program to limit utilization of blood resources and decrease the risk of bleeding.Class I, Level B-R

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ExtraCorporeal TechnologySame topicBlood transfusion and managementFrench-language works237,207