Bibliographic record
Abstract
I first met King Gordon in the summer of 1978 when he agreed to become a subject for my dissertation research into the philosophical roots of Canadian socialism as it came to expression in the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF).I was particularly interested in how the ideas of Fabian socialism were brought to Canada by returning Rhodes scholars (my study also included F.H. Underhill and F.R. Scott), and how these ideas were adapted to the Canadian political culture.In working through the full range of Gordon's papers, I became convinced that the wider story of his work deserved to come to the attention of his fellow Canadians; but when I urged him to write his autobiography, he responded that he was too busy (undoubtedly true) and that he rather hoped I would do the task for him.It was a task that after his death I felt honoured to undertake.In my view, King Gordon offers a compelling example of a young Canadian courageously struggling to find his place within the currents of twentieth-century thought, and his life exhibits a rare combination of intellectual reflection and political activism.In his mature years, he exemplified that quality for which Canadians have been known and admired throughout the world: a good citizen at home and a dedicated internationalist abroad.King Gordon's life is a uniquely Canadian story, descended through both parents from Selkirk settlers, and spanning the twentieth century.His father, Charles W. Gordon, wrote bestselling novels under the name Ralph Connor.He was educated in Manitoba, at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar, and as a student of Reinhold Niebuhr at
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.292 | 0.121 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".