Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the past nine thousand years people of diverse cultural backgrounds have occupied the Quebec-Labrador coast, known today as the Lower North Shore, extending eastward from Kegashka, a village near the Natashquan River, to Blanc-Sablon, a community near the Newfoundland-Labrador border.These people were drawn to the region because of an abundance of aquatic creatures, including salmon, seal, and cod; the many terrestrial mammals, such as the caribou and the beaver; and a large avian population.The Aboriginal people, the first occupants of the area, followed a seasonal round and hunted a variety of animals, such as seals and caribou; harvested different kinds of fish, including salmon and trout; and gathered berries and birds' eggs.In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries migratory fishermen from Europe came to the region annually in the summer months, erected temporary dwellings, and pursued the cod and whale fisheries.From the middle of seventeenth century through to the first two decades of the nineteenth century, French-and English-speaking entrepreneurs from the town of Quebec established permanent fishing posts in the area, engaged in the seal and salmon fisheries and the fur trade, and maintained a monopoly in the area.With the demise of the company known as Labrador New Concern in 1820, French-speaking migrants from places such as Quebec and the surrounding area and the Îles de la Madeleine (Magdalen Recto Running Head
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.640 | 0.436 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".