Kinematic Path Planning for Underactuated Spacecraft Reorientation with Forbidden Pointing Constraints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessEngineering NotesKinematic Path Planning for Underactuated Spacecraft Reorientation with Forbidden Pointing ConstraintsChao Duan, Qinglei Hu, Zheng H. Zhu, Xiaodong Shao and Huai-Ning WuChao DuanBeihang University, 100191 Beijing, People's Republic of China, Qinglei HuBeihang University, 100191 Beijing, People's Republic of China, Zheng H. Zhu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0149-0473York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada, Xiaodong ShaoBeihang University, 100191 Beijing, People's Republic of China and Huai-Ning WuBeihang University, 100191 Beijing, People's Republic of ChinaPublished Online:2 Aug 2023https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G006968SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Giulietti F. and Tortora P., "Optimal Rotation Angle About a Nonnominal Euler Axis," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 30, No. 5, 2007, pp. 1561–1563. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.31547 LinkGoogle Scholar[2] Avanzini G. and Giulietti F., "Constrained Slews for Single-Axis Pointing," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1814–1817. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.38291 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Avanzini G. and Giulietti F., "Kinematic Planning of Slew Manoeuvres After Actuator Failure for Low-Cost Satellites," Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 22, No. 5, 2009, pp. 649–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2009.04.008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[4] Avanzini G., Berardo L., Giulietti F. and Minisci E. A., "Optimal Rotation Sequences in Presence of Constraints on Admissible Rotation Axes," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2011, pp. 554–563. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.49805 LinkGoogle Scholar[5] Zavoli A., De Matteis G., Giulietti F. and Avanzini G., "Single-Axis Pointing of an Underactuated Spacecraft Equipped with Two Reaction Wheels," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2017, pp. 1465–1471. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002182 LinkGoogle Scholar[6] de Angelis E. L., Giulietti F. and Avanzini G., "Single-Axis Pointing of Underactuated Spacecraft in the Presence of Path Constraints," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2014, pp. 143–147. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000121 Google Scholar[7] Duan C., Hu Q. L., Zhang Y. M. and Wu H. N., "Constrained Single-Axis Path Planning of Underactuated Spacecraft," Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 107, Dec. 2020, Paper 106345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106345 Google Scholar[8] Krishnan H., McClamroch N. H. and Reyhanoglu M., "Attitude Stabilization of a Rigid Spacecraft Using Two Momentum Wheel Actuators," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1995, pp. 256–263. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21378 LinkGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails What's Popular Articles in Advance CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2023 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-3884 to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAeronauticsComputational Fluid DynamicsComputing, Information, and CommunicationControl TheoryFeedback ControlFluid DynamicsGuidance, Navigation, and Control SystemsNumerical AnalysisRobot KinematicsRoboticsSpace Systems and VehiclesSpacecraftsStructures, Design and Test KeywordsRobot KinematicsSpacecraftsNumerical SimulationFeedback ControlAviation SafetyAcknowledgmentsThis work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grants 62227812 and 61960206011. It was also supported in part by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation under grant LD22E050004.PDF Received16 May 2022Accepted12 June 2023Published online2 August 2023
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".