An intelligent socially assistive robot-wearable sensors system for personalized user dressing assistance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Individuals living with cognitive impairments are faced with unique challenges in completing important activities of daily living such as dressing. In this paper, we present the first socially assistive robot-wearable sensors system to provide dressing assistance through social human-robot interactions. A novel robot-wearable architecture has been developed to recognize and classify user dressing actions and provide personalized prompts and feedback. Our system uses smart clothing with embedded strain sensors to estimate the user’s actions, which are then classified into different dressing steps. Our assistive robot uses a MAXQ hierarchical learning method to learn appropriate assistive behaviors to aid a user with the sequence of dressing steps. Experiments conducted validated the performance of our robot-wearable system in identifying and effectively responding to a variety of user states and dressing step actions. Furthermore, a robot demonstration study with stakeholders found that overall, they had positive perceptions and attitudes towards the socially assistive robot-wearable system, in particular with respect to its usefulness with the intended user population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it