MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385551371 · doi:10.35194/jd.v6i2.3125

The Use of Expressions of Self Interjection and its Meaning on Social Media

2023· article· en· W4385551371 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDinamika · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Methods and Impacts
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSadnessPsychologyHumanitiesSocial mediaSocial psychologySurpriseFeelingAngerSociologyArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article will describe various kinds of expressions of teenagers on social media such as Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp, and others. The method used in this research is a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. The results of the study show that the majority of teenagers in Purwakarta use social media to share experiences through uploaded photos and statuses. Uploading self-expression through social media is carried out every day with high intensity. The expressions used generally function to express surprise or shock, pleasure, anger, sadness, and so on. The most used social media is Facebook. Adolescents' motivation in expressing themselves is due to the desire to express feelings and display personal photos as entertainment and to get responses from others. Their satisfaction is a source of pride in themselves. This satisfaction is generally influenced by the mood of teenagers who usually change. Self-expression for adolescents can also be interpreted as a place for self-existence driven by the desire to be known by many people (viral).Keywords: expression; interjection; social mediaAbstrak Artikel ini akan memaparkan berbagai macam ekspresi para remaja di media sosial seperti Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp, dan yang lainnya. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mayoritas remaja di Purwakarta menggunakan media sosial untuk berbagi pengalaman melalui foto dan status yang diunggah. Pengunggahan ekspresi diri melalui media sosial dilakukan setiap hari dengan intensitas yang tinggi. Ungkapan yang digunakan pada umumnya berfungsi untuk mengungkapkan rasa kaget atau keterkejutan, rasa senang, rasa marah, rasa sedih, dan sebagainya. Media sosial yang paling sering digunakan adalah facebook. Motivasi remaja dalam mengeskpresikan diri karena adanya keinginan untuk mencurahkan perasaan dan menampilkan foto-foto pribadi sebagai hiburan dan agar mendapatkan respon dari orang lain. Kepuasan mereka menjadi kebanggaan terhadap dirinya sendiri. Kepuasan tersebut umumnya dipengaruhi oleh suasana hati remaja yang biasa berubah-ubah. Ekspresi diri bagi remaja bisa dimaknai pula sebagai ajang untuk esksistensi diri didorong oleh keinginan untuk dikenal banyak orang (viral). Kata kunci: ekspresi; interjeksi; media sosial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.299
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it