MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385557992 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v26i2.a06

Synthesis and Characterization of Multi Metal Oxide Nanocomposite (ZnO-SrO-MgO) and Its Applications

2023· article· en· W4385557992 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
K. C. Seetha Lakshmi, V. Vanitha, R. Kirupagaran, V. Rajarajeswari, R.R. Muthuchudarkodi, S. Thanikaikarasan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanocompositeCharacterization (materials science)Materials scienceMetalOxideZincNanotechnologyChemical engineeringMetallurgyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanotechnology used widely due its smaller in size and massive application in all field of science.Metal oxide nanoparticles are a significant class of nanomaterials with numerous uses in both science and technology.A heterogeneous, versatile multi metal oxid ZnO-SrO-MgO has been prepared by chemical co-precipitation method.Synthesis can achieve selected surface structure, phase, shape and size of metal oxide nanoparticles, resulting in a set of desired attributes.The synthesized multi metal oxide nanoparticles were characterized by various instrumental techniques.The synthesized multi metal oxide materials beautifully present in nano meter level as 94 nm identified through SEM analysis.Absorption spectra from UV confirmed the multi metal oxide from its corresponding peaks.XRD peaks with plane obtained in the range it's confirmed the presence nanoparticles.Multi metal oxide exhibits good antifungal and antimicrobial activity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicMagnesium Oxide Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207