MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385603931 · doi:10.60099/prijnr.2023.262040

Causal Model of Health Literacy in Thai Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis

2023· article· en· W4385603931 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Porntip Pa-in, Tipaporn Wonghongkul, Sirirat Panuthai, Totsaporn Khampolsiri, Rojanee Chintanawat

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChiang Mai University
KeywordsHealth literacyLiteracyMedicineDescriptive statisticsSocial supportGerontologyHealth carePhysical therapyPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knee osteoarthritis is the most common form of arthritis causing disability among older adults. Proper self-care is vital and achievable with health literacy. Thai older adults with knee osteoarthritis have been found to have inadequate health literacy, and poor selfcare behaviors for this condition. The purpose of this descriptive cross-sectional study was to test a causal model of health literacy in Thai older adults with knee osteoarthritis, depicting relationships among provider-patient communication, patient engagement, cognitive function, knowledge of knee osteoarthritis, Internet use, social support, social participation, and health literacy. Participants comprised 318 older adults with knee osteoarthritis, selected using multi-stage random sampling from nine community hospitals in a northern Thai province. Data were collected using a demographic data form, the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire, the Provider-patient Communication Scale, the Patient Health Engagement Scale, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic, the Arthritis Knowledge Scale, the Internet Use Questionnaire, the Social Support Questionnaire, and the Community Participation of the Elderly Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s product moment correlation, and structural equation modeling. The final model fitted with empirical data and explained 36% of the variance in health literacy with Internet use as the strongest predictor directly affecting health literacy. Internet use and social participation had positive direct and indirect effects on health literacy via cognitive function. Cognitive function and social support positively directly affected health literacy. Patient engagement negatively affected health literacy indirectly via Internet use. Knowledge of knee osteoarthritis and provider-patient communication did not affect health literacy directly or indirectly. In conclusion, nurses should design interventions to promote health literacy of this population by highlighting Internet use, social participation, cognitive function, social support, and patient engagement, with testing in clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.537
Teacher spread0.414 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePacific Rim International Journal of Nursing ResearchSame topicHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207