MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385633422 · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2023.08.001

U.S. Food and Drug Administration Must Ban Menthol Cigarettes Without Delay: Lessons From Other Countries

2023· article· en· W4385633422 on OpenAlexafffund
Janet Chung‐Hall, Lorraine Craig, Christina N Kyriakos, Geoffrey T. Fong

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of Waterloo
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilLongfondsImperial College LondonHartstichtingCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Cancer InstituteKWF KankerbestrijdingDiabetes FondsCanadian Cancer SocietyTrombosestichting NederlandUniversity of WarwickOntario Institute for Cancer Research
KeywordsMentholFood and drug administrationEnvironmental healthMedicinePublic healthEthnic groupPopulationAdministration (probate law)Political scienceLawNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On April 28, 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced its long-awaited proposed rule to prohibit menthol as a characterizing flavor in cigarettes.1 Finalization of the proposed rule will dramatically improve and protect the health of Americans by preventing tobacco-related disease and death. The public health benefits will be greatest among population groups who suffer health disparities arising from disproportionate use of menthol cigarettes because of targeted marketing, including young people, women, and racial and ethnic minorities, particularly Black Americans.2 An evaluation of the impact of Canada's menthol cigarette ban by Fong et al.3 estimated that a similar ban in the US would lead to quitting among more than 1.3 million people who smoke, of whom 381,000 would be Black Americans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0060.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Preventive MedicineSame topicSmoking Behavior and CessationFrench-language works237,207