MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385633744 · doi:10.14740/jcgo880

Screening for Thyroid Disorder in First Trimester of Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study

2023· article· en· W4385633744 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sumnima Mainali, S Kayastha, Sagar Devkota, Priyanka Yadav, Bishal Bharati, Sristi Upadhyay, Sailuja Maharjan, Sarbagya Manandhar, Laxman Timilsina

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSecond trimesterCross-sectional studyObstetricsFirst trimesterPregnancyThyroid disorderGynecologyThyroidGestationEndocrinologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Alteration in thyroid function is very common among females, in particular during pregnancy. The majority of them are clinically veiled, and with considerable differences in outcome of mother and fetus, even more serious maternal and fetal outcome if present during the first trimester. So, we conducted this study to explore the magnitude of thyroid problems during first trimester of pregnancy at a tertiary health care facility in Nepal and highlight the benefits of its early diagnosis. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted over a period of 1 year among 160 pregnant females in their first trimester, attending to the outpatient department of a tertiary care center. Blood samples were collected from all the patients for thyroid function test which included measurement of serum levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (fT4), and free tri-iodothyronine (fT3). Pregnant females with previously diagnosed thyroid disorders or currently under medications were excluded. Results: Among the 160 patients included in the study, 25.83 years was the mean age. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.62 kg/m 2 and most of the patients were overweight (40.625%). Of the patients 53.12% were primigravida and 46.87% were multigravida. Based on the thyroid function tests, 91.25% were found to be euthyroid, 3.125% were hyperthyroid and 5.625% were hypothyroid. The prevalence of subclinical hyperthyroidism and overt hyperthyroidism was found to be 60% and 40% respectively and that of subclinical hypothyroidism and overt hypothyroidism was 55.6% and 44.4% respectively. None of the patients had symptoms of thyroid disorder (neither hyperthyroidism nor hypothyroidism). The correlation between BMI and TSH among the pregnant females included in the study was statistically significant when tested by using Karl Pearson correlation coefficient (r = 0.164, P = 0.038). Conclusions: Based on this study, around one in every 12 pregnant women had thyroid disorder. Early identification of thyroid disorders and prompt initiation of treatment is very essential for the health of mother and fetus due to the significant maternal or fetal morbidity and mortality associated with thyroid disorders. Thus, routine screening for thyroid disorder should be considered during pregnancy. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2023;12(2):52-58 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo880

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207