MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385635818 · doi:10.1002/adfm.202304630

On‐Chip Reconstitution of Uniformly Shear‐Sensing 3D Matrix‐Embedded Multicellular Blood Microvessel

2023· article· en· W4385635818 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Quoc Vo, Kaely A. Carlson, Peter M. Chiknas, Chad Brocker, Luis L. P. daSilva, Erica Clark, Sang Ki Park, A. Seun Ajiboye, Eric M. Wier, Kambez H. Benam

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCenter for Tobacco ProductsNational Institutes of HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationHamilton Health Sciences FoundationUniversity of Pittsburgh
KeywordsMaterials scienceMicrovesselMatrix (chemical analysis)ChipShear (geology)Composite materialNanotechnologyBiomedical engineeringAngiogenesisBiologyElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Preclinical human‐relevant modeling of organ‐specific vasculature offers a unique opportunity to recreate pathophysiological intercellular, tissue‐tissue, and cell‐matrix interactions for a broad range of applications. Here, this work presents a reliable, and simply reproducible process for constructing user‐controlled long rounded extracellular matrix (ECM) embedded vascular microlumens on‐chip for endothelization and co‐culture with stromal cells obtained from human lung. This work demonstrates the critical impact of microchannel cross‐sectional geometry and length on uniform distribution and magnitude of vascular wall shear stress, which is key when emulating in vivo observed blood flow biomechanics in health and disease. In addition, this study provides an optimization protocol for multicellular culture and functional validation of the system. Moreover, this study shows the ability to finely tune rheology of the three‐dimensional natural matrix surrounding the vascular microchannel to match pathophysiological stiffness. In summary, this work provides the scientific community with a matrix‐embedded microvasculature on‐chip populated with all‐primary human‐derived pulmonary endothelial cells and fibroblasts to recapitulate and interrogate lung parenchymal biology, physiological responses, vascular biomechanics, and disease biogenesis in vitro. Such a mix‐and‐match synthetic platform can be feasibly adapted to study blood vessels, matrix, and ECM‐embedded cells in other organs and be cellularized with additional stromal cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207