MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Agricultural activities lead to sediment infilling of wetlandscapes in the Canadian Prairies: Assessment of contributions by tillage, water and wind erosion

2023· article· en· W4385648609 on OpenAlex
Ehsan Zarrinabadi, David A. Lobb, Sheng Li, Alexander J. Koiter, Pascal Badiou

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoderma · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil erosion and sediment transport
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityDucks Unlimited CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsErosionTillageEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Aeolian processesSedimentWetlandWEPPUniversal Soil Loss EquationSoil conservationSoil scienceGeologyAgricultureSoil lossEcologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soil erosion and sediment delivery models have been increasingly employed in studies of catchment sediment dynamics in current years. These models are also used to represent the spatial interaction of soil erosion and sediment transport processes, thereby providing spatially-distributed predictions of soil redistribution rates for agricultural landscapes. It has been widely recognized that individual soil erosion processes and their interactions contribute towards total soil erosion; however, quantifying the rates and patterns of soil erosion processes and their interactions within topographically complex landscapes is challenging. Therefore, the objective of this research was to estimate and model the relative contributions of tillage, water and wind erosion towards total soil erosion in the Canadian Prairie provinces of Manitoba and Alberta using 137Cs, a fallout radionuclide tracer, and three well-established models: (i) Tillage Erosion Model (TillEM); (ii) Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, version 2 (RUSLE2); and (iii) Single-event Wind Erosion Evaluation Program (SWEEP). The findings indicate that the patterns of 137Cs-estimated soil erosion were closely matched with the erosion pattern predicted by TillEM and suggests that tillage erosion dominates the pattern of total soil erosion on the knolls of hummocky landscapes. Additionally, soil particle size variation within the wetland catchments reflected the modeled patterns of water and tillage erosion. Furthermore, our findings confirmed that colour coefficients are useful in identifying spatial heterogeneity of soil within wetland catchments and reflect the patterns of soil loss and gains. These results indicate that water and tillage erosion, and also their interactions, are main erosion processes in the Canadian Prairie Pothole Region (PPR), but that soil movement by tillage practices has been the predominant redistribution process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it