MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385658479 · doi:10.1089/thy.2023.0114

Thyrotropin Screening of Newborns: Before or After 72 Hours of Life? Before Discharge or at Home?

2023· article· en· W4385658479 on OpenAlexaff
Emese Boros, Lionel Marcélis, Guy Van Vliet, Farel Elilie Mawa Ongoth, Claudine Heinrichs, Cécile Brachet

Bibliographic record

VenueThyroid · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Health and Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePediatricsNewborn screeningCongenital hypothyroidismGestationSampling (signal processing)Blood samplingRetrospective cohort studyPregnancySurgeryInternal medicineThyroid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective:Until November 2019 in Belgium, dried blood spot (DBS) sampling was performed between 72 and 120 hours of life, when a majority of newborns had already been discharged from the maternity. In November 2019, the policy for newborn screening in South Belgium changed to allow sampling as soon as 48 hours of life, with the objective to accelerate the process and to allow more sampling during the hospital stay. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of this policy modification and, in particular, to assess the effectiveness of screening for hypothyroidism based on sampling before or after 72 hours of life, as well as to compare the effectiveness of DBS collection before discharge or at home. Methods:This retrospective study included live births ≥37 weeks of gestation, screened by the Université Libre de Bruxelles Newborn Screening Center between January 2019 and December 2021. To evaluate the efficiency of early sampling, we compared thyrotropin (TSH) results for screening <72 hours and screening ≥72 hours. We also compared TSH results of DBS performed before discharge with those performed at home. Results:A total of 53,794 newborns were included. The results of 24,816 healthy newborns screened before 72 hours of life and of 28,978 healthy newborns screened between 72 and 144 hours of life were compared. The median TSH level was similar (1.50 and 1.20 mU/L, respectively). The percentage of false positives was similar (0.08% and 0.07%, respectively). Earlier sampling, before 72 hours, allowed treatment of positive cases at 6 days rather than 8.5 days. DBS sampling at home resulted in longer delay for transferring the sample to the laboratory (a median of 3.0 days for hospital sampling vs. 5.0 days for home sampling). A poorer quality of home blood sampling was observed, with 0.27% unusable samples compared with 0.06% unusable samples for hospital sampling (p < 0.001). Conclusions:In term newborns, TSH screening before discharge, as early as 48 hours of life, is a valid strategy. It allows earlier treatment of positive cases, does not increase the percentage of false positives, and results in fewer unusable samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThyroidSame topicNeonatal Health and BiochemistryFrench-language works237,207