MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S245: RUXOLITINIB IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH TREATMENT-NAIVE OR STEROID-REFRACTORY CHRONIC GRAFT VERSUS HOST DISEASE: PRIMARY FINDINGS FROM THE PHASE II REACH5 STUDY

2023· article· en· W4385667083 on OpenAlexaff
Franco Locatelli, Bülent Antmen, Hyoung Jin Kang, Katsuyoshi Koh, Yoshiyuki Takahashi, Alphan Küpesiz, Maria Gabriela Matos, Donna A. Wall, Sunil Bhat, Ho Joon Im, Tayfun Güngör, Meng‐Yao Lu, Tommaso Stefanelli, Christine Rosko, Annie St. Pierre, K. Burock, Cristina Díaz de Heredia

Bibliographic record

VenueHemaSphere · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRuxolitinibClinical endpointRefractory (planetary science)Graft-versus-host diseaseInternal medicineTransplantationCalcineurinHematopoietic stem cell transplantationPhases of clinical researchGastroenterologyClinical trialSurgeryBone marrowMyelofibrosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Topic: 22. Stem cell transplantation - Clinical Background: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) is a major complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation and ≈ 50% of patients (pts) become steroid-refractory (SR) or steroid-dependent. In the phase 3 REACH3 randomized study (Zeiser et al., N Engl J Med, 2021), ruxolitinib (RUX) demonstrated a superior overall response rate (ORR) vs. best available therapy in pts ≥12 years with SR cGvHD. Aims: We present the first data from REACH5 (NCT03774082), a phase 2 open-label, single-arm, multicenter study of RUX added to corticosteroids (CS) in pediatric pts with moderate to severe cGvHD. Methods: Pts with moderate to severe treatment-naive or SR cGvHD were grouped according to age (Group 1: ≥12 to <18 years, Group 2: ≥6 to <12 years, and Group 3: ≥2 to <6 years). All pts received RUX plus CS ± calcineurin inhibitor for up to 3 years (39 cycles of 28 days/week 156); RUX starting dose was 10 mg twice daily [BID] in Group 1, 5 mg BID in Group 2, and 4 mg/m2 BID in Group 3). The primary efficacy endpoint was ORR at cycle 7 day 1 (C7D1); key secondary endpoints included best overall response (BOR) up to C7D1, failure-free survival, overall survival, and evaluation of safety. CS taper was permitted 2 weeks after the achievement of complete or partial response; following successful CS taper, RUX taper could commence after C7D1. Data were analyzed once all pts had completed 1 year of treatment or discontinued earlier (data cut-off 19 October 2022). Results: Overall, 45 pediatric pts were treated with RUX; 64.4% were male and the median age was 11.0 years (range, 2.0–17.8). At screening, 37.8% of pts had moderate cGvHD and 62.2% had severe cGvHD; 62.2% were SR and 37.8% were treatment-naive. Median time from cGvHD diagnosis to start of study treatment was 49 days (range,1–2999). At data cut-off, the treatment phase was ongoing for 15 pts and 30 pts had discontinued treatment; the most common reasons for discontinuation were physician’s decision (15.6%), adverse event (AE; 13.3%) and lack of efficacy (13.3%). Among all pts, the ORR at C7D1 was 40% (18/45; 90% confidence interval [CI] 27.7, 53.3) and the BOR rate up to C7D1 was 82.2% (37/45; 90% CI 70.2, 90.8) (Table). ORR at C7D1 in treatment-naive and SR pts were 41.2% and 39.3%, respectively. Of pts receiving CS at baseline (40/45; 88.9%), 42.5% (17/40) stopped or completely tapered CS and 75.0% (30/40) had a ≥50% reduction from baseline at least once by C7D1. Among all pts, the CS-free ORR at data cut-off was 37.8% (17/45; 90% CI 25.7, 51.1). The median duration of RUX exposure was 55.1 weeks (range 2.1–112.1). In total, 97.8% (44/45) of pts had an AE (any grade) and 64.4% had a ≥3 grade AE. Most frequently reported AEs were anemia (22.2% any grade; 20.0% ≥3 grade), COVID-19 (17.8% any grade; 4.4% ≥3 grade) and decreased neutrophil count (17.8% any grade; 17.8% ≥3 grade). Overall, 73.3% (33/45) of pts had an infection. Viral infections occurred in 40.0% (18/45) of pts, including 17.8% (8/45) SARS-CoV-2 infections; bacterial and fungal infections occurred in 2.2% and 11.1% of pts, respectively. Overall, 10 (22.2%) pts died during the study. Three (6.7%) pts died whilst receiving RUX or within 30 days of the last study dose; causes of death were aspergillus pneumonia, septic shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome (1 pt each). Summary/Conclusion: In pediatric pts with cGvHD, RUX treatment led to high ORR at C7D1 and a high BOR up to C7D1, across age groups. ORR was similar in treatment-naive and SR pts at C7D1. The safety profile was consistent with expectations for RUX and this pt population. This study was sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals.Keywords: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), Pediatric, Chronic graft-versus-host, Ruxolitinib

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemaSphereSame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207