Female infertility, Alexithymia and Stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction In this research the Paris School (I.P.S.O.), by P. Marty, is chosen as the theoretical and clinical basis of Psychosomatics. We work with the degree of mentalization (good, bad and uncertain) -obtained through Marty’s Psychosomatic Classification-, as a previous diagnosis and prognosis of 120 infertile women undergoing treatment at the Assisted Reproduction Unit (ARU) at Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre in Madrid. Objectives a) To analyse the statistical coincidence between female infertility, stress and alexithymia syndrome. b) To verify the differences between psychosomatic disorders and other somatoform symptoms and syndromes (conversive and hypochondriac). c) To test the following hypothesis: subjects whose degree of mentalization is deficient, present high degree of alexithymia and stress. Methods 120 infertile women undergoing treatment with Assisted Reproduction Techniques were examined by means of psychodiagnostic tests. Diagnostic tools: P. Mary’s Psychosomatic Classification (P.C.) (semi-structured interview), as a means of diagnosing the degree of mentalization; T.A.S. (Toronto Alexithymia Scale); Battery of stress measurement questionnaires (H.A.D., PANAS. IRE, MCMQ). The correlation of coincidence between the results of C.P. and the different Alexithymia and Stress questionnaires with the independent variable (success or failure of pregnancy in the selected subjects) has been studied, applying Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient. Results With respect to what was obtained in the Psychosomatic Classification: - T.A.S. questionnaire yields a coefficient of [-0.48]. Therefore, there is a negative correlation between the degree of mentalization and the presence of alexithymia; in other words, as the degree of mentalization increases, the degree of alexithymia decreases and vice versa; - There is positive correlation [0.39] between the results of Mentalization (Psychosomatic Classification) and the degree of stress; therefore, the existence of stress does not prevent better mentalization. Conclusions The present research concludes: a) that people at risk for psychosomatic disorders have high scores on “alexithymia”; b) that patients at high risk for psychosomatic disorders do not necessarily suffer from “stress” situations; c) that there are many indicators in behavior and psychological functioning that differentiate psychosomatic disorders from conversive and hypochondriac disorders - both in their etiology and their development; d) there is a statistical correlation between female infertility and alexithymia; e) there is no statistical correlation between female infertility and stress. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".