MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A membrane-associated inhibitory axis of MHC-I presentation for cancer immune evasion

2023· article· en· W4385685303 on OpenAlexaff
Lu Qiao, Xufeng Chen, Hua Zhou, Jia Liu, Bettina Nadorp, Audrey Lasry, Zhengxi Sun, Jiangyan Zhang, Michael Cammer, Kun Wang, Zoe Ciantra, Jia You, Qianjin Guo, Hongbing Zhang, Debrup Sengupta, Ahmad Boukhris, Liu C, Peter Cresswell, Patricia L. M. Dahia, Iannis Aifantis, Jun Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCD8Cancer researchMyeloid leukemiaImmune systemMHC class ILeukemiaTransmembrane proteinMajor histocompatibility complexImmunologyCross-presentationEvasion (ethics)GeneticsReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Although the success of immune-checkpoint blockade has revolutionized cancer treatment, a number of tumors do not respond or develop resistance, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A potential mode of resistance is immune evasion of T-cell immunity involving aberrant MHC-I antigen presentation (AP). To map such mechanisms of resistance we identified key AP regulators using specific peptide-MHC-I-guided CRISPR/Cas9 screens in AML. The top-ranked negative regulators were surface protein Sushi Domain Containing 6 (SUSD6), Transmembrane Protein 127 (TMEM127), and the E3 ubiquitin ligase WWP2. SUSD6 is abundantly-expressed in AML and multiple solid cancers, ablation of which profoundly enhanced AP and reduced tumor growth in CD8+ T cell-dependent manner. Mechanistically, SUSD6 forms a molecular complex with TMEM127 and MHC-I, recruiting WWP2 for MHC-I lysosomal degradation. Together with the SUSD6-TMEM127-WWP2 gene signature negatively-correlated with cancer survival, our findings define a membrane-associated AP inhibitory axis as broadly-applicable therapeutic targets for both leukemia and solid cancers. This work is supported by the Mark Foundation ASPIRE Award to J.W. I.A. is supported by the NIH (NCI and NHLBI) (R01CA216421, R01 CA173636, 1R01CA228135, R01CA242020, 1R01HL159175), the Vogelstein Foundation and the Evans MDS Foundation. J.W. is supported by the NIH (R37CA273333-01, R21AI163924-02). Q.L. is supported by the Cancer Research Institute Irvington Postdoctoral Fellowship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicImmune Cell Function and Interaction→French-language works237,207→