MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein S1 subunit Trigger Proinflammatory Response in Macrophages in the Absence of Productive Infection

2023· article· en· W4385686837 on OpenAlexaff
Lindsay Grace Miller, Kim Chiok, Santanu Bose, Tanya A. Miura

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProinflammatory cytokineDownregulation and upregulationChemokineCXCL10Immune systemImmunologyMacrophageTumor necrosis factor alphaBiologyProtein subunitInflammationVirologyMedicineIn vitroGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract One of the hallmarks of critically ill COVID-19 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 is exaggerated inflammatory response. Though macrophages mediate inflammatory responses and can produce pro-inflammatory cytokines to eliminate pathogens, infection with SARS-CoV-2 has been shown to cause immune dysfunction, leading to hyperinflammation in the lungs. To further understand the role of macrophages in hyperinflammatory responses during SARS-CoV-2 infection, we infected a THP-1 human derived macrophage cell line with SARS-CoV-2. Our results show that, though macrophages do not support viral replication, infection with SARS-CoV-2 still results in the upregulation of the mRNA of cytokines TNFα and CXCL10, which are markers of COVID-related hyperinflammation. In addition, we identified SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein S1 subunit as one viral factor involved in the upregulation of cytokines in macrophages. We show that glycosylated, soluble S1 protein can upregulate TNFα and CXCL10 mRNAs, as well as the secretion of TNFα, in macrophages in the absence of virus infection. Therefore, macrophage activation by the S1 subunit and SARS-CoV-2 infection may contribute to the hyperinflammation in the lungs seen in critically ill patients through the upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNFα and CXCL10. Supported by NIH grant (R01 AI083387), Washington Research Foundation, and NIH NIGMS Predoctoral Biotechnology Training Grant 5T32GM008336

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies→French-language works237,207→