MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385704872 · doi:10.1111/jtsa.12712

Margin‐closed vector autoregressive time series models

2023· article· en· W4385704872 on OpenAlexafffund
Lin Zhang, Harry Joe, Natalia Nolde

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Time Series Analysis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAutoregressive modelUnivariateMathematicsCopula (linguistics)Series (stratigraphy)STAR modelGaussianAutoregressive–moving-average modelMarginal distributionApplied mathematicsEconometricsTime seriesAutoregressive integrated moving averageStatisticsMultivariate statisticsRandom variable

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conditions are obtained for a Gaussian vector autoregressive time series of order , VAR(), to have univariate margins that are autoregressive of order or lower‐dimensional margins that are also VAR(). This can lead to ‐dimensional VAR() models that are closed with respect to a given partition of by specifying marginal serial dependence and some cross‐sectional dependence parameters. The special closure property allows one to fit the subprocesses of multi‐variate time series before assembling them by fitting the dependence structure between the subprocesses. We revisit the use of the Gaussian copula of the stationary joint distribution of observations in the VAR() process with non‐Gaussian univariate margins but under the constraint of closure under margins. This construction allows more flexibility in handling higher‐dimensional time series and a multi‐stage estimation procedure can be used. The proposed class of models is applied to a macro‐economic data set and compared with the relevant benchmark models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Time Series AnalysisSame topicMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFrench-language works237,207